California has taken an enormous step towards regulating AI. SB 243 — a invoice that might regulate AI companion chatbots with a view to shield minors and weak customers — handed each the State Meeting and Senate with bipartisan assist and now heads to Governor Gavin Newsom’s desk.
Newsom has till October 12 to both veto the invoice or signal it into regulation. If he indicators, it might take impact January 1, 2026, making California the primary state to require AI chatbot operators to implement security protocols for AI companions and maintain firms legally accountable if their chatbots fail to satisfy these requirements.
The invoice particularly goals to forestall companion chatbots — which the laws defines as AI programs that present adaptive, human-like responses and are able to assembly a consumer’s social wants — from participating in conversations round suicidal ideation, self-harm, or sexually specific content material.
The invoice would require platforms to supply recurring alerts to customers — each three hours for minors — reminding them that they’re chatting with an AI chatbot, not an actual individual, and that they need to take a break. It additionally establishes annual reporting and transparency necessities for AI firms that supply companion chatbots, together with main gamers OpenAI, Character.AI, and Replika, which might go into impact July 1, 2027.
The California invoice would additionally permit people who consider they’ve been injured by violations to file lawsuits towards AI firms looking for injunctive aid, damages (as much as $1,000 per violation), and lawyer’s charges.
SB 243 was launched in January by state senators Steve Padilla and Josh Becker. It gained momentum within the California legislature following the loss of life of teenager Adam Raine, who dedicated suicide after extended chats with OpenAI’s ChatGPT that concerned discussing and planning his loss of life and self-harm. The laws additionally responds to leaked inner paperwork that reportedly confirmed Meta’s chatbots had been allowed to interact in “romantic” and “sensual” chats with youngsters.
In current weeks, U.S. lawmakers and regulators have responded with intensified scrutiny of AI platforms’ safeguards to guard minors. The Federal Commerce Fee is getting ready to research how AI chatbots influence youngsters’s psychological well being. Texas lawyer basic Ken Paxton has launched investigations into Meta and Character.AI, accusing them of deceptive youngsters with psychological well being claims. In the meantime, each Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) have launched separate probes into Meta.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
“I feel the hurt is probably nice, which implies we’ve got to maneuver rapidly,” Padilla instructed TechCrunch. “We are able to put affordable safeguards in place to be sure that significantly minors know they’re not speaking to an actual human being, that these platforms hyperlink folks to the right sources when folks say issues like they’re interested by hurting themselves or they’re in misery, [and] to ensure there’s not inappropriate publicity to inappropriate materials.”
Padilla additionally pressured the significance of AI firms sharing information concerning the variety of occasions they refer customers to disaster companies annually, “so we’ve got a greater understanding of the frequency of this downside, moderately than solely turning into conscious of it when somebody’s harmed or worse.”
SB 243 beforehand had stronger necessities, however many had been whittled down by way of amendments. For instance, the invoice initially would have required operators to forestall AI chatbots from utilizing “variable reward” ways or different options that encourage extreme engagement. These ways, utilized by AI companion firms like Replika and Character, provide customers particular messages, reminiscences, storylines, or the power to unlock uncommon responses or new personalities, creating what critics name a probably addictive reward loop.
The present invoice additionally removes provisions that might have required operators to trace and report how typically chatbots initiated discussions of suicidal ideation or actions with customers.
“I feel it strikes the fitting steadiness of attending to the harms with out imposing one thing that’s both unattainable for firms to adjust to, both as a result of it’s technically not possible or simply lots of paperwork for nothing,” Becker instructed TechCrunch.
SB 243 is transferring towards turning into regulation at a time when Silicon Valley firms are pouring thousands and thousands of {dollars} into pro-AI political motion committees (PACs) to again candidates within the upcoming midterm elections who favor a light-touch method to AI regulation.
The invoice additionally comes as California weighs one other AI security invoice, SB 53, which might mandate complete transparency reporting necessities. OpenAI has written an open letter to Governor Newsom, asking him to desert that invoice in favor of much less stringent federal and worldwide frameworks. Main tech firms like Meta, Google, and Amazon have additionally opposed SB 53. In distinction, solely Anthropic has mentioned it helps SB 53.
“I reject the premise that it is a zero-sum state of affairs, that innovation and regulation are mutually unique,” Padilla mentioned. “Don’t inform me that we will’t stroll and chew gum. We are able to assist innovation and growth that we predict is wholesome and has advantages — and there are advantages to this expertise, clearly — and on the similar time, we will present affordable safeguards for essentially the most weak folks.”
“We’re intently monitoring the legislative and regulatory panorama, and we welcome working with regulators and lawmakers as they start to contemplate laws for this rising area,” a Character.AI spokesperson instructed TechCrunch, noting that the startup already consists of outstanding disclaimers all through the consumer chat expertise explaining that it must be handled as fiction.
A spokesperson for Meta declined to remark.
TechCrunch has reached out to OpenAI, Anthropic, and Replika for remark.
